Wave Biocompatibility of Materials: Independent Scientific Validation

Viktor Dyment, Independent Researcher | healthfrequency.com

Glen Rein, PhD | Quantum-Biology Research LabOctober 2025

ABSTRACT

This study presents independent scientific validation of the wave biocompatibility hypothesis using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) to measure cellular-level effects of textile materials. Results demonstrate that specific fabrics produce measurable changes (up to 25%) in the electrical conductivity of human buccal cells, supporting the theory that materials interact with biological systems through wave-mediated mechanisms. This validation bridges empirical observations with quantifiable bioelectrical measurements.

INTRODUCTION

Background: The Wave Biocompatibility Hypothesis

For over 30 years, Viktor Dyment has researched the interaction between materials and human physiology, developing a classification system of four wave categories:

• Category 1 (Healing): Materials with optimal frequency alignment, producing maximum therapeutic effects. Methodology for creating Category 1 materials remains proprietary.

• Category 2 (Favorable): Materials that harmonize with biological frequencies, enhancing cellular function

• Category 3 (Typical): Standard materials causing mild disruption

• Category 4 (Destructive): Materials creating severe interference, impairing physiological processes

Dyment hypothesized that these effects operate through "quantum information waves" (QIW), in which electromagnetic emissions from materials disrupt thermoregulation, protein synthesis, etc., when resonantly interacting with cellular receptors, mitochondria, signaling systems, electrochemical processes, and vital functions, thereby exerting essential effects on functionality and electrochemical processes.

The Discovery

Through systematic testing of thousands of products over three decades, Dyment identified specific commercial products with exceptional wave biocompatibility (Category 2):

1. Company Cotton™ Classic Ultra-Cozy Cotton Velvet Flannel Bed Sheets

2. L.L.Bean Men's Premium Double L® Polo

These products, unlike visually identical competitors (Category 3), were claimed to produce measurable physiological effects. This observation led to collaboration with Dr. Glen Rein to test the hypothesis using rigorous scientific methodology.

Scientific Context

All physical objects emit weak electromagnetic (EM) energy (black-body radiation). Cotton is known to conduct and store electrical energy, and recent research has demonstrated that cotton-like polymers can convert body heat into light and electricity (Attia, 2022; Thielen, 2017). However, the specific biological effects of different textile frequencies have not been systematically studied.

METHODOLOGY

A. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

The Quantum-Biology Research Lab developed an enhanced EIS method to measure electrical energy at the cellular level. Since the body is electrochemical in nature, electrical measurements provide the most accessible and accurate assessment of biofield changes.

Key Methodological Innovations:

1. Dissimilar Metal Electrodes

   • One pure silver, one pure gold electrode

   • Creates non-traditional energies between electrodes (Decca, 2003)

   • Enhances sensitivity to quantum charge transfer effects

2. Tesla Coil Electrode Geometry

   • Counter-wound flat coil design (not cylindrical)

   • Generates longitudinal scalar waves

   • Cancels conventional transverse waves

3. Resonant Frequency Measurement

   • Measurements at 1.39 kHz (not arbitrary 2 kHz)

   • This frequency represents the resonance peak of human cheek cells

   • Measuring at resonant frequency dramatically increases sensitivity

This modified EIS technique has been validated over many years for measuring subtle energetic effects on water, biomolecules, and now living cells.

B. Biological Sample: Buccal Cells

Why buccal (cheek) cells?

• More stable than blood cells

• Readily accessible (simple cheek scraping)

• Electrical properties well-characterized (Kuznetsov, 2016)

• Frequency-dependent conductivity changes documented

• Accepted scientific model for biofield measurements

C. Experimental Protocol

Test Conditions:

• Exposure Times: 1 hour and 10 hours (overnight)

• Environmental Controls: No cell phone or computer exposure 1 hour before/during testing

• Measurements: Impedance, capacitance, and resistance

• Comparison Groups:

  • L.L.Bean Double L® Polo (Category 2 - identified by Dyment)

  • Old Navy Polo (Category 3 - standard fabric)

  • Company Cotton™ flannel sheets (Category 2 - identified by Dyment)

  • Control (no treatment)

Procedure:

1. Baseline EIS measurement of buccal cells

2. Subject wears polo shirt or sleeps between sheets

3. Post-exposure EIS measurement

4. Calculate percentage change in electrical conductivity

RESULTS

Impedance Changes (in kilohms)

10-Hour Overnight Exposure:

Material	Category	Before	After	% Change
Company Cotton™	2	70.3	52.8	-25.0%
L.L.Bean Polo	2	68.2	72.3	+6.0%
Old Navy Polo (standard)	3	77.1	72.6	-5.8%
Control (no treatment)	-	72.4	69.2	-4.4%

1-Hour Exposure:

Material	Category	Before	After	% Change
Company Cotton™	2	77.8	73.2	-5.9%
L.L.Bean Polo	2	70.5	72.8	+3.3%
Old Navy Polo (standard)	3	69.4	67.5	-2.7%
Control (no treatment)	-	67.7	65.6	-3.1%

Key Findings

1. Company Cotton™ Sheets (Category 2):

   • Produced 25% decrease in impedance (increased conductivity) after 10 hours

   • Effect magnitude far exceeds typical environmental variations (3-4%)

   • Strongest effect of any Category 2 material tested to date

2. L.L.Bean Polo (Category 2):

   • Produced 6% increase in impedance (decreased conductivity) after 10 hours

   • Effect opposite to standard Old Navy polo (-5.8%)

   • Net difference of 12% between Category 2 and Category 3 polo shirts

3. Dose-Response Relationship:

   • Longer exposure (10 hours) produced stronger effects

   • Effects were directionally consistent but weaker at 1 hour

4. Material Specificity:

   • Identical-appearing products (L.L.Bean vs. Old Navy polo) produced opposite effects

   • Confirms Dyment's hypothesis that wave properties, not chemical composition alone, determine biological interaction

Note on Category 1 Materials:Based on the theoretical framework and preliminary observations, Category 1 materials are expected to produce even more potent effects than the 25% change observed with Category 2 materials. The methodology for creating Category 1 materials is in development and partially successful; intellectual property rights protect Health Frequency Gold Alloy.

DISCUSSION

Interpretation of Conductivity Changes

Does healing energy always increase conductivity?

No. Years of testing various healing technologies at the Quantum-Biology Research Lab reveal that:

• Some beneficial devices increase conductivity

• Others decrease conductivity

• The direction of effect depends on the individual physiological baseline state

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Parallel:

TCM practitioners recognize that some meridians need stimulation, others need sedation. Blockage of energy flow through meridians is associated with illness. Similarly, the body's electrical system may require either enhancement or dampening depending on the baseline state.

Magnitude of Effects

The 25% conductivity change from Company Cotton™ sheets is exceptionally strong compared to other tested technologies:

• Most devices produce changes around 10-20%

• The sheets' effect is among the strongest documented

• The 12% differential between L.L.Bean and Old Navy polos is also clinically significant

• These are Category 2 materials; Category 1 materials would likely produce even more pronounced effects

Wave Categories Validated

These results provide quantitative support for Dyment's wave category system:

• Category 1 (Healing): Health Frequency Gold Alloy can optimize local thermoregulation in damaged areas by more than 15°F  

• Category 2 (Favorable): Company Cotton™ sheets - massive 25% effect

• Category 2 (Favorable): L.L.Bean polo - significant directional effect (12% vs. Category 3)

• Category 3 (Typical): Old Navy polo - minimal effect aligned with ambient EM noise

The fact that visually identical products produce opposite biological effects cannot be explained by chemical composition alone and supports the wave interaction hypothesis.

Critical Research Limitation:The identification of Four Categories of materials requires Dyment's unique sensory capabilities developed over 30+ years. Without his expertise in material selection, researchers cannot reliably distinguish Category 2 from Category 3 materials, making independent replication challenging. This highlights the need for:

1. Development of instrumental methods to measure wave biocompatibility

2. Collaboration with Dyment for material identification

3. Training protocols to develop similar sensory discrimination abilities

Proposed Mechanism

The electrical properties of cotton fabrics are influenced by:

1. Molecular structure and fiber arrangement

2. Manufacturing processes (weaving, dyeing, finishing, etc.)

3. Electromagnetic properties created by these factors

These factors create unique signs of frequency signatures that interact with the body's bioelectrical field at the cellular level. When material frequencies align with cellular resonances (Category 1 and 2 biocompatibility), they enhance energy flow. When misaligned (Category 3-4), they create interference and blockage wave flows.

INTEGRATION WITH THERMOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Complementary Evidence

Dyment's thermographic studies of a specialized gold-silver-copper alloy ring (patent application US 2013/0259736 A1) demonstrated:

• Temperature increases up to 15°F (8°C) in 30 minutes

• Enhanced microcirculation in individuals with impairments

• Effects are particularly pronounced in subjects with circulatory dysfunction

• Video documentation available at healthfrequency.com

Unified Model

The EIS study (electrical/cellular level) and thermographic study (circulatory/tissue level) provide convergent evidence:

Cellular Level (EIS):Category 2 Materials → Wave interactions → Altered electrical conductivity → Changed cellular energetics

Tissue Level (Thermography):Category 1 Alloy → Wave interactions → Enhanced circulation → Increased temperature

Both pathways support the hypothesis that materials with specific wave properties modulate biological function through electromagnetic mechanisms operating across multiple physiological scales.

CRITICAL CONFOUNDING FACTOR: DENTAL MATERIALS

The Hidden Variable

Preliminary Dyment observations suggest that dental materials represent a significant confounding variable in wave biocompatibility research:

Problem: Most existing dental materials (amalgams, composites, crowns) fall into Category 3 and 4 (destructive wave properties), creating:

• Continuous electromagnetic disruption

• Blockage of beneficial effects from Categories 1 and 2 materials

• Interference with the accurate measurement of physiological responses

Implication for Research:Subjects with Category 3 and 4 dental materials may show attenuated or inconsistent responses to Category 2 textiles and other materials. This could explain variability in experimental results and complicate the interpretation of data.

Priority Need:Development of Category 2 dental materials is essential for:

1. Accurate biocompatibility research (eliminating confounding variable)

2. Maximizing therapeutic effects of other Category 2 products

3. Addressing a major source of chronic wave-mediated health disruption

Without biocompatible dental materials, even optimal clothing, bedding, and environmental products cannot achieve their full potential for supporting health and longevity.

IMPLICATIONS

For Medicine and Health

1. Material Selection: Clothing, bedding, and medical textiles should be evaluated for wave biocompatibility, not just chemical safety

2. Chronic Disease: Many unexplained symptoms may result from cumulative exposure to Category 3-4 materials

3. Therapeutic Applications: Category 2 materials could serve as non-pharmaceutical interventions

4. Dental Medicine: Urgent need for wave-biocompatible dental materials

For Research

1. Reproducibility: This protocol can be replicated, but requires Dyment's expertise for material identification

2. Expansion: Testing additional fabrics, metals, plastics, and dental materials

3. Mechanism: Investigating specific frequency bands responsible for effects

4. Instrumentation: Developing objective methods to measure wave biocompatibility

For Industry

1. Manufacturing Standards: Processes could be optimized for manufacturers of wave biocompatible products

2. Quality Control: EIS testing could verify biocompatible properties

3. Product Development: Intentional design of Category 2 textiles and materials

4. Dental Materials: New market for biocompatible restorative materials

LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Current Study Limitations

• Single researcher (self-testing by Dr. Rein)

• Small sample size per condition

• Limited to specific commercial products identified by Dyment

• Mechanism not fully elucidated

• Requires Dyment's expertise for material selection

Proposed Next Steps

1. Blinded Replication

   • 30+ subjects per material type

   • Double-blind protocol with Dyment providing coded materials

   • Multiple independent laboratories

   • Control for dental material status

2. Expanded Material Testing

   • Systematic comparison of dozens of fabrics identified by Dyment

   • Correlation with manufacturing processes

   • Identification of key frequency signatures using spectroscopy

3. Mechanistic Studies

   • Direct measurement of EM emissions from fabrics

   • Cellular receptor involvement

   • Mitochondrial activity assessment

   • Frequency analysis of Category 2 vs Category 3 materials

4. Clinical Trials

   • Patients with circulatory disorders

   • Sleep quality with Category 2 bedding

   • Recovery rates with optimized textiles

   • Subjects screened for dental material status

5. Dental Material Development

   • Testing existing materials for wave properties

   • Development of Category 2 dental composites

   • Clinical trials comparing Category 2 vs Category 3 and 4 dental materials

CONCLUSION

This study provides independent scientific validation of Viktor Dyment's wave biocompatibility hypothesis using established electrochemical methodology. Key findings:

1. Measurable Effects: Category 2 textiles produce up to 25% changes in cellular electrical conductivity

2. Material Specificity: Identical-appearing products (Category 2 vs 3) have opposite biological effects

3. Dose-Response: Longer exposure produces stronger effects

4. Practical Significance: Effects exceed typical environmental variations by 5-10x

5. Expert-Dependent: Material identification currently requires Dyment's unique sensory capabilities

These results support the theory that materials interact with biological systems through wave-mediated mechanisms operating at the cellular level. The magnitude and specificity of effects warrant expanded research into wave biocompatibility as a new paradigm for material safety and therapeutic application.

The convergence of EIS measurements, thermographic observations, and 30+ years of empirical research establishes a foundation for recognizing wave biocompatibility as a legitimate area of scientific investigation.

Critical Next Step: Development of Category 2 dental materials to eliminate a major confounding variable and unlock the full potential of wave biocompatibility interventions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the volunteers who participated in these preliminary studies. Special recognition to Viktor Dyment for three decades of dedicated research identifying wave-biocompatible materials despite significant personal and financial challenges. His unique sensory capabilities and material expertise made this validation study possible.

REFERENCES

Wave Biocompatibility Theory:

• Dyment V. (2025). Wave biocompatibility of materials: Concept and protocol. healthfrequency.com

• Dyment V. (2013). Biocompatible precious metal alloy. US Patent Application 2013/0259736 A1

EIS Study References:

• Abasi S, et al. (2022). Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy for monitoring mammalian cells and tissues. ACS Measurement Science Au, 2(6):495-516

• Attia RM, et al. (2022). Electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of conductive cotton fabrics. J Industrial Textiles, 51(2_suppl):3149S-75S

• Decca RS, et al. (2003). Measurement of the Casimir force between dissimilar metals. Physical Review Letters, 91(5):050402

• González-Correa CA. (2018). Clinical applications of electrical impedance spectroscopy. In: Bioimpedance in Biomedical Applications and Research (pp. 187-218)

• Kuznetsov KA, et al. (2016). Response of human buccal epithelium cells to combined exposures. Biophysical Bulletin, 2(36):19-26

• Rein G. (2025). Evidence for bio-energetic influence of human DNA in-vitro. Int'l J Healing & Caring, 25(2):4-19

• Thielen M, et al. (2017). Human body heat for powering wearable devices. Energy Conversion Management, 131:44-54

Author Information:

Viktor Dyment Independent Researcher, Wave Biocompatibility

healthfrequency.com

30+ years research in material-biology interactions

Glen Rein, PhDDirector, Quantum-Biology Research Lab

reinglen@gmail.comhttp://quantum-biology.org

Keywords: wave biocompatibility, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, buccal cells, textile bioeffects, quantum information waves, cellular conductivity, bioelectromagnetics, material science, integrative medicine, dental materials